A review from someone who once asked their teenager “How was school?” and received only a grunt, an eye roll, and a slammed door—and wondered if they’d ever have a real conversation again

Your sweet, talkative child has been replaced by an alien.

This creature communicates primarily through monosyllables, sighs, and eye rolls. They find everything you say embarrassing, everything you do mortifying, and everything you believe hopelessly outdated. They can spend four hours texting friends but can’t manage a five-minute conversation with you.

You remember when they told you everything. Now they tell you nothing. You remember when they wanted your company. Now they want your car keys. You remember when you were their hero. Now you’re their obstacle.

You’ve tried reasoning with them. They call it lecturing. You’ve tried understanding them. They call it prying. You’ve tried giving them space. They call it not caring. Every approach seems wrong. Every conversation seems to end in conflict or silence.

Is this just how it is? Is the teenage years simply a relationship wasteland you survive until they become human again? Or is there a way to stay connected to this person who seems determined to push you away?

Haim G. Ginott’s Between Parent and Teenager was revolutionary when published in 1969—and remains remarkably relevant today. Ginott argues that the way we talk to teenagers determines whether we connect or collide. And most parents, despite best intentions, are talking in ways that guarantee collision.

But can a book from over fifty years ago really help with today’s teenagers? Let’s examine what still resonates, what feels dated, and whether the art of talking to teens can actually be learned.

---

What Is This Book? 🤔

Between Parent and Teenager is a communication manual for the parent-teen relationship. Ginott, a child psychologist and parent educator, argues that most parent-teen conflict stems not from irreconcilable differences but from destructive communication patterns.

The core premise: Teenagers are engaged in a necessary developmental task—separating from parents and forming independent identity. This process is painful for everyone. But HOW parents communicate during this separation determines whether the relationship survives and strengthens or fractures and fails.

The book covers:

Part One: The Teenage Condition

• Understanding adolescent development
• Why teenagers seem impossible
• The tasks of adolescence
• What teens need from parents

Part Two: Communication Principles

• The difference between helpful and hurtful responses
• Acknowledging feelings without agreeing with behavior
• Avoiding communication killers
• The power of brief responses

Part Three: Specific Challenges

• Sex, drugs, and difficult topics
• Responsibility and independence
• Discipline and limits
• School and achievement
• Friends and social life
• Family relationships

Part Four: The Big Picture

• Letting go while staying connected
• Preparing for adulthood
• Maintaining relationship through turbulence

The book is dialogue-heavy, showing actual conversations—what parents typically say, why it fails, and what to say instead. It’s practical, specific, and immediately applicable. 📖

---

The Good Stuff ✅

The Core Insight Remains Timelessly True

Ginott’s fundamental observation:

What parents do:
Respond to the content of what teenagers say.

What parents should do:
Respond to the feeling beneath what teenagers say.

Example:

Teen says: “School is so stupid. I hate it. Why do I even have to go?”

Typical parent response (to content):
“School isn’t stupid. Education is important. You have to go because it’s the law and because you need to learn things for your future.”

Result: Lecture delivered. Teen tunes out. No connection made.

Ginott’s alternative (to feeling):
“Sounds like you had a rough day.”

Result: Teen feels heard. Door opens for more conversation. Connection possible.

Why this matters:
Teenagers rarely say what they actually mean directly. “School is stupid” might mean “I failed a test,” “My friends are ignoring me,” “I’m overwhelmed,” or “I feel like a failure.” Responding to the literal statement misses entirely.

The principle:
Listen for the music, not just the words. Respond to the emotion, not just the content.

This single shift transforms conversations. 🎯

The “Communication Killers” List Is Devastatingly Accurate

Ginott identifies responses that shut down conversation instantly:

Criticizing:
“That’s a ridiculous thing to say.”
“You’re being immature.”
“What’s wrong with you?”

Lecturing:
“When I was your age…”
“You need to understand that…”
“The problem with your generation is…”

Preaching:
“You should be grateful.”
“A good person would…”
“The right thing to do is…”

Interrogating:
“Why did you do that?”
“What were you thinking?”
“Who else was there? What exactly happened?”

Diagnosing:
“You’re just saying that because you’re tired.”
“The real reason you feel that way is…”
“You don’t actually mean that.”

Threatening:
“If you don’t stop, I’ll…”
“One more time and you’re grounded.”
“Keep it up and see what happens.”

Minimizing:
“It’s not that big a deal.”
“You’ll get over it.”
“Everyone goes through this.”

Sarcasm:
“Oh, that’s brilliant.”
“Good luck with that.”
“Sure, because that always works out so well.”

Why these kill conversation:
Each one communicates: “Your feelings are wrong. Your perspective is invalid. I know better.” Teenagers, developmentally wired to seek autonomy, respond by shutting down or fighting back.

The painful recognition:
Most parents use these regularly. Most of us learned them from our own parents. Breaking the pattern requires conscious effort.

We talk our teenagers into silence. ✨

The “Brief Response” Philosophy Is Counterintuitive but Effective

Ginott advocates for less talking, not more:

The typical parent:
Teen shares something → Parent responds at length → Parent gives advice → Parent shares related experience → Parent offers perspective → Parent suggests solutions → Teen has stopped listening

Ginott’s alternative:
Teen shares something → Parent responds briefly, acknowledging feeling → Silence → Teen continues (if they choose)

Example:

Teen: “My friend totally betrayed me. I can’t believe what she did.”

Long response (typical):
“Oh no, what happened? I knew that girl was trouble. I’ve seen this coming. You need to be careful who you trust. Friends like that aren’t worth your time. When I was your age, I had a friend who did something similar, and I learned that…” [continues for several minutes]

Brief response (Ginott):
“That really hurts.”

Then: Wait. Let them continue if they want. Don’t fill the silence.

Why brief works:

• Doesn’t overwhelm
• Doesn’t hijack their experience
• Shows trust in their ability to work it out
• Creates space for them to continue
• Doesn’t trigger defensiveness

The discipline:
Keeping responses short requires tremendous restraint. We WANT to help. We WANT to share wisdom. We WANT to prevent pain. But our helping often hinders.

Say less. Listen more. 💪

The “Acknowledging Without Agreeing” Distinction Is Crucial

Parents often confuse these:

The fear:
“If I acknowledge their feeling, I’m agreeing with their position.”

The result:
Parents argue with feelings. “You shouldn’t feel that way.” “That’s not something to be angry about.”

Ginott’s clarification:
Acknowledging a feeling is not the same as agreeing with a position or approving a behavior.

Example:

Teen: “I hate my curfew. All my friends can stay out later. You’re the strictest parents in the world. It’s so unfair.”

Arguing with the feeling:
“You don’t hate your curfew; you hate being told no. And your friends probably have earlier curfews than you think. We’re not that strict.”

Acknowledging without agreeing:
“You really wish you could stay out later. It’s frustrating to have limits.”

Then, if needed:
“And the curfew stays at 11:00.”

Why this works:
The teen feels heard. They may still be unhappy, but they’re not dismissed. You can hold a limit while acknowledging it’s hard.

The magic:
Teens are more likely to accept limits from parents who acknowledge their feelings. “I know this is hard AND this is the rule” is more effective than “Stop complaining and follow the rule.”

Understanding doesn’t mean capitulating. 🌟

The Privacy and Autonomy Emphasis Is Essential

Ginott understands adolescent development:

The developmental task:
Teenagers must separate from parents and form independent identity. This is healthy, necessary, and non-optional. Fighting it damages both child and relationship.

What this means practically:

They need privacy:
Not everything is your business. Their room, their phone, their conversations—they need some space that’s theirs.

They need to make decisions:
Even bad ones, when consequences are survivable. This is how they learn.

They need to disagree:
With you, with your values, with your opinions. This is how they discover their own.

They need to fail:
At relationships, at school, at life. This is how they develop resilience.

The parent’s task:
Let go gradually while staying available. Maintain connection without control. Provide safety net without directing every move.

The mantra:
“Be a consultant, not a manager.”

The hard truth:
The closeness of childhood is over. The closeness of adulthood is not yet possible. The teenage years are a bridge—necessarily uncomfortable for everyone.

Separation is healthy. Grieve it but don’t fight it. 🧠

The Respect Principle Transforms Interactions

Ginott insists on treating teenagers with dignity:

The baseline:
Would you speak to a friend this way? To a colleague? To a stranger?

If not, don’t speak to your teenager that way.

What respect looks like:

• Knocking before entering their room
• Not reading their private communications without cause
• Not mocking or belittling
• Not discussing them negatively in front of others
• Not using shame as discipline
• Not comparing them to siblings or others
• Asking rather than demanding when possible
• Explaining rather than dictating when possible

What disrespect looks like:

• Sarcasm and mockery
• Public embarrassment
• Invasion of privacy
• Dismissal of feelings
• Treating them as less-than
• Using size/power/authority to dominate

The reciprocity:
You cannot demand respect while offering disrespect. You cannot teach respect through disrespectful treatment.

The principle:
“I will not treat my teenager in ways I would not tolerate being treated myself.”

Respect is not earned by teenagers. It’s owed. 📝

The “Safe Harbor” Concept Anchors the Relationship

Ginott argues for unconditional relationship:

The message every teen needs:
“No matter what you do, no matter how badly you mess up, no matter how much we disagree, I am still your parent and I still love you. This relationship is permanent.”

Why this matters:
Teenagers are taking risks—with identity, with relationships, with choices. They need to know that home is safe. That they can fail and still be welcomed. That parental love isn’t conditional on performance.

What threatens safety:

• Love withdrawal as punishment
• Rejection or abandonment threats
• “If you do X, don’t bother coming home”
• Making love contingent on behavior, achievement, or compliance
• The sense that messing up means losing relationship

What creates safety:

• Consistent presence despite conflict
• Separating behavior from personhood
• “I’m angry about what you did AND I love you”
• Willingness to repair after rupture
• The sense that nothing can permanently break the bond

The anchor:
When everything else is changing—their body, their brain, their identity, their relationships—the parent-child bond should be the one constant.

Be the anchor. They’re navigating a storm. ❤️

The Dialogue Examples Are Immediately Applicable

Unlike theoretical books, Ginott shows actual conversations:

Scenario: Teen comes home past curfew

Typical dialogue:
Parent: “Where have you been? You’re an hour late! I’ve been worried sick! You never think about anyone but yourself! Do you know what could have happened? You’re grounded for a month!”

Teen: “It’s not that big a deal. My phone died. You’re overreacting.”

Parent: “Not a big deal? I’ll show you what’s a big deal!”

[Escalation continues]

Ginott dialogue:
Parent: “You’re home.”

Teen: “Yeah. Sorry, lost track of time.”

Parent: “I was worried.”

Teen: “My phone died.”

Parent: [Next day, calmly] “About last night. When you’re going to be late, I need you to find a way to let me know. What ideas do you have for making sure that happens?”

The difference:
First dialogue: Emotion dump, accusation, escalation, punishment announced in heat of moment.

Second dialogue: Brief acknowledgment, emotional restraint, problem-solving when calm.

The result:
First approach: Defensive teen, damaged relationship, problem unsolved.

Second approach: Possibly more cooperative teen, relationship intact, problem addressed.

Show, don’t just tell. 🎓

---

The Not-So-Good Stuff 😬

The Book’s Age Shows

Published in 1969, some elements feel dated:

What’s changed:

Technology: No mention of smartphones, social media, or digital life—now central to teen experience.

Gender: Some assumptions about gender roles feel antiquated.

Family structures: Assumes traditional two-parent family.

Cultural context: 1960s suburban American assumptions throughout.

Specific issues: Topics like vaping, online predators, sexting, social media bullying—absent.

What still applies:
The communication principles are timeless. HOW to talk respectfully, HOW to acknowledge feelings, HOW to maintain connection—these don’t depend on technology.

The translation required:
Modern parents must apply 1969 wisdom to 2024 problems. The principles transfer; the specific examples often don’t.

What would help:
A contemporary edition updating examples for current challenges while preserving core insights.

Timeless principles, dated examples. 📱

The “Ideal Parent” Voice Can Feel Unattainable

Ginott’s example dialogues feature remarkably calm, thoughtful parents:

What Ginott parents do:

• Never lose their temper
• Always have the perfect brief response ready
• Remain calm when their teen is raging
• Don’t get triggered by button-pushing

What real parents do:

• Lose their temper regularly
• Say the wrong thing in the moment
• Get triggered by specific behaviors
• React before they can think

The gap:
The model dialogues can feel aspirational to the point of discouragement. “I could never respond that calmly.”

What’s missing:
More acknowledgment of what to do AFTER you’ve blown it. More realistic progression from reactive to responsive. More compassion for parents who are human.

The honest truth:
You won’t always respond like the Ginott examples. The goal is progress, not perfection.

Idealism can discourage if untempered by realism. 😬

Neurodivergent Teens Need Different Approaches

Like most books of its era:

What’s assumed:
Neurotypical adolescent development.

What’s not addressed:

ADHD teens:

• May not be able to “think before speaking”
• Executive function affects responsibility
• Different approaches needed for impulsivity

Autistic teens:

• Communication patterns differ
• Emotional expression may look different
• Social expectations may need modification

Anxious teens:

• May need more support, not more autonomy
• Privacy needs may differ
• Brief responses may not be sufficient

Depressed teens:

• Withdrawal may be symptom, not just typical teen behavior
• Different intervention needed
• Professional support often required

The gap:
The book’s advice assumes a baseline of typical development. For neurodivergent teens, significant adaptation is needed.

What’s needed:
Guidance on when typical teen communication advice doesn’t apply.

Not all teenagers fit the same model. 🩺

The Cultural Lens Is Narrow

The book reflects specific cultural assumptions:

Western individualism:

• Independence as goal
• Privacy as right
• Individual identity formation as primary task

Middle-class assumptions:

• Resources for college, activities, etc.
• Certain freedoms assumed as baseline
• Particular concerns prioritized

American context:

• Specific cultural norms about teen behavior
• Certain expectations about family structure
• Particular relationship to authority

What varies across cultures:

• Appropriate level of teen autonomy
• Privacy norms
• Parent authority expectations
• Family involvement in decisions
• Individual vs. collective identity

The translation needed:
Parents from different cultural backgrounds must adapt principles to fit their values and context.

One cultural model doesn’t fit all families. 🌍

Some Advice Feels Too Permissive for Today’s Stakes

The emphasis on autonomy and non-interference:

Ginott’s era:
Teenagers faced different risks. The consequences of mistakes were often more survivable.

Today’s reality:

• Social media can make mistakes permanent and public
• Drug potency has increased dramatically
• College competition has intensified
• Mental health crisis among teens
• Online predators and exploitation

The tension:
“Give them privacy” feels different when that privacy includes access to the entire internet.

“Let them make mistakes” feels different when those mistakes can be screenshotted and shared forever.

“Don’t interrogate” feels different when you’re genuinely worried about fentanyl-laced substances.

What’s needed:
Updated guidance on where modern risks require more involvement than 1969 risks did.

The balance:
The communication principles still apply. But the level of appropriate oversight may need to be higher for certain contemporary risks.

Some stakes have changed. 😬

The Single-Focus Limitation

The book focuses on communication:

What it covers well:
How to talk, what to say, communication patterns that work.

What it doesn’t cover:

• Screen time and technology management
• Mental health recognition and intervention
• Substance abuse prevention and response
• Academic pressure and school stress
• College preparation and planning
• Sexuality and relationships in modern context
• Social media and digital citizenship

The gap:
Parents of teenagers face many challenges beyond communication. This book addresses one (important) piece.

What’s needed:
Supplementary resources for the specific issues the book doesn’t address.

Communication is necessary but not sufficient. 📚

The “Fixed by Talking” Assumption Has Limits

Ginott’s approach is fundamentally about words:

The belief:
If you communicate better, the relationship will improve.

The limitation:
Some teenage problems aren’t communication problems.

Examples:

Mental illness: Depression, anxiety, eating disorders require more than better parent communication.

Trauma: Past or present trauma needs professional intervention.

Substance addiction: Talk won’t solve chemical dependency.

Serious behavior issues: Some situations require intervention beyond conversation.

Learning differences: Communication won’t address academic struggles from learning disabilities.

The risk:
Parents who try to “talk better” about problems needing professional help may delay necessary intervention.

What’s needed:
Clearer guidance on when communication isn’t enough and professional help is required.

Not every problem is solved by talking better. 🚨

---

Who Is This For? 🎯

Perfect if you:

• Find yourself in constant conflict with your teenager
• Want to improve communication without being manipulative
• Believe relationship matters more than control
• Can adapt timeless principles to modern context
• Have neurotypical teens going through typical development
• Need specific language for difficult conversations
• Want to understand the “why” behind teen behavior
• Are willing to change your own patterns first

Not ideal if you:

• Need guidance on technology and social media specifically
• Have neurodivergent teens needing specialized approaches
• Are in crisis situations requiring immediate professional intervention
• Want a comprehensive guide to all teen challenges
• Need culturally specific guidance for your background
• Find the dated examples too difficult to translate
• Want more focus on what to do when you mess up
• Are looking for the teen’s perspective represented

---

Alternatives Worth Considering 🔄

How to Talk So Teens Will Listen & Listen So Teens Will Talk by Adele Faber & Elaine Mazlish: Directly builds on Ginott’s work (they studied with him) with updated examples. More contemporary, same principles. 🏆

Get Out of My Life, but First Could You Drive Me & Cheryl to the Mall? by Anthony E. Wolf: Humorous, practical guide with similar philosophy. More accessible tone, modern updates.

The Teenage Brain by Frances E. Jensen: Neuroscience perspective on adolescent behavior. Explains the “why” behind what Ginott addresses.

Untangled: Guiding Teenage Girls Through the Seven Transitions of Adolescence by Lisa Damour: Girls-specific guidance with contemporary updates. Research-based, practically applicable.

Brainstorm: The Power and Purpose of the Teenage Brain by Daniel Siegel: Brain science meets relationship guidance. Modern, comprehensive, attachment-focused.

The Self-Driven Child by William Stixrud & Ned Johnson: Autonomy and motivation focus. Excellent complement to Ginott’s relationship emphasis. 📚

---

The Final Verdict 🏅

Between Parent and Teenager remains a foundational text in parent-teen communication more than fifty years after publication. The core insights—respond to feelings not just words, keep responses brief, acknowledge without agreeing, treat teenagers with respect, be a safe harbor—are as relevant today as they were in 1969.

For parents trapped in cycles of conflict and disconnection, Ginott offers a clear path back to relationship. The problem isn’t your teenager. The problem is how you’re talking to each other. And talking is something you can change.

However, the book’s age creates real limitations. The absence of technology guidance, the dated examples, the narrow cultural lens, and the assumption of neurotypical development all require readers to do significant translation work. The idealized dialogue examples can feel unattainable. And some contemporary challenges require more than better communication.

The useful parts:

• Responding to feelings, not just content: Transformative insight
• Communication killers identification: Painful but necessary recognition
• Brief response philosophy: Counterintuitive but effective
• Acknowledging without agreeing: Crucial distinction
• Privacy and autonomy emphasis: Developmentally essential
• Respect principle: Non-negotiable foundation
• Safe harbor concept: Anchors everything
• Dialogue examples: Immediately applicable

The problematic parts:

• Dated examples: 1969 doesn’t automatically translate to 2024
• Idealized dialogues: May feel unattainable
• Neurodivergent gaps: Assumes typical development
• Cultural narrowness: One lens presented as universal
• Contemporary stakes absent: Some modern risks need more intervention
• Single-focus limitation: Communication isn’t everything
• “Fixed by talking” assumption: Some problems need professional help

The best approach: Read Ginott for the principles. Supplement with contemporary resources for specific issues. Adapt the timeless insights to your modern context. And give yourself grace when you don’t sound like the idealized parent in the examples.

The bottom line: Between Parent and Teenager deserves its classic status because it addresses something fundamental: how we talk to the people we love during one of the most difficult developmental transitions. The teenage years are hard—for them and for you. The relationship will be tested.

What Ginott offers is a way to stay connected through the testing. Not to avoid conflict—that’s impossible—but to handle conflict in ways that don’t destroy relationship. Not to control your teenager—that’s neither possible nor desirable—but to maintain influence through connection rather than coercion.

Your teenager doesn’t need you to be perfect. They need you to be present, respectful, and safe. They need to know that your love isn’t contingent on their compliance. They need a harbor to return to when the seas get rough.

The way you talk to them either builds that harbor or destroys it.

Ginott teaches you how to build.

And that’s a lesson that never goes out of style—no matter how much the world changes around it.

Your relationship with your teenager can survive the teenage years. It can even deepen. But only if you learn to talk in ways that connect rather than collide.

That’s the gift Ginott offers. And fifty years later, it’s still worth receiving. 🏠✨

---

How has communication with your teenager evolved? What phrases or approaches have helped you stay connected? Where do you struggle to apply principles like these in the heat of the moment? Share your experiences and what’s worked for your family below!