A review from someone who watched their child shut down completely at a minor change of plans and thought, “How do I raise a human who can handle life being life?”

Your child melts down when plans change. They refuse to try anything new. They give up at the first sign of difficulty. They react to minor frustrations like the world is ending. They seem rigid, anxious, and perpetually braced for disaster.

You’ve tried encouraging them. Pushing them. Protecting them. Reasoning with them. You’ve wondered if this is just their temperament—something fixed and unchangeable that you’ll spend eighteen years managing.

Meanwhile, you’ve noticed other children who seem… different. They bounce back from disappointment. They embrace challenges. They adapt to the unexpected. They move through the world with a kind of openness and flexibility that your child seems to lack entirely.

What’s the difference? Is it nature? Nurture? Luck?

Daniel Siegel and Tina Payne Bryson’s The Yes Brain argues it’s none of the above—or rather, it’s something you can actively cultivate. The difference between children who crumble and children who cope isn’t fixed. It’s a brain state. And brain states can be developed.

But can a book really teach you to build resilience, flexibility, and openness in your child? Or is this neuroscience oversimplified into false promises? Let’s examine what holds up, what falls short, and whether you can actually raise a “Yes Brain” child.

---

What Is This Book? 🤔

The Yes Brain introduces a framework for understanding two fundamental states children (and adults) operate from:

The No Brain:

• Reactive rather than receptive
• Rigid and inflexible
• Shut down or explosive
• Defensive and closed
• Fight, flight, or freeze mode
• Sees threats everywhere
• Contracts away from challenges

The Yes Brain:

• Open and curious
• Flexible and adaptable
• Resilient in the face of setbacks
• Connected and empathic
• Willing to try new things
• Sees possibilities rather than threats
• Expands toward challenges

The book argues that these aren’t personality types—they’re states that shift based on circumstances, environment, and crucially, development. And parents can actively cultivate Yes Brain states in their children.

The framework centers on four fundamentals (forming the acronym BRIE):

1. Balance — Emotional regulation and stability
2. Resilience — Bouncing back from adversity
3. Insight — Understanding one’s own mind
4. Empathy — Understanding others’ minds

The book covers:

• The neuroscience behind Yes Brain and No Brain states
• Why modern life pushes children toward No Brain reactivity
• How to cultivate each of the four fundamentals
• Practical strategies for daily implementation
• Age-appropriate applications
• How parents’ own brain states affect their children
• Building a Yes Brain family culture
• Addressing common challenges and resistance

It’s the third book in Siegel and Bryson’s trilogy (after The Whole-Brain Child and No-Drama Discipline), synthesizing their approach into a unified developmental vision. 📖

---

The Good Stuff ✅

The Yes Brain/No Brain Framework Is Instantly Clarifying

The book’s central model illuminates everyday behavior:

What No Brain looks like in children:

• Rigid insistence on things being a certain way
• Meltdowns over small disappointments
• Refusal to try new foods, activities, or experiences
• Giving up immediately when something is hard
• Explosive reactions to minor frustrations
• Withdrawal or shutdown when overwhelmed
• Anxiety about anything unfamiliar
• Difficulty recovering from setbacks

What Yes Brain looks like in children:

• Flexibility when plans change
• Curiosity about new experiences
• Willingness to try even when success isn’t guaranteed
• Persistence through difficulty
• Proportionate responses to frustrations
• Ability to recover from disappointments
• Openness to the unfamiliar
• Resilience in the face of challenges

The key insight:
These aren’t fixed traits. They’re states. The same child can be in Yes Brain mode in one context and No Brain mode in another. The question isn’t “Is my child a Yes Brain kid?” but “What pushes my child into No Brain, and how can I help them access Yes Brain more often?”

Why this matters:
It transforms how you see your “difficult” child. They’re not fundamentally flawed. They’re frequently in No Brain state. And that’s something you can address.

The practical application:
When your child is being rigid, reactive, or shut down, you can recognize: “They’re in No Brain right now. What do they need to shift toward Yes Brain?”

This reframe changes everything about how you respond. 🎯

The BRIE Framework Provides Clear Development Goals

The four fundamentals give parents concrete targets:

Balance:

What it is: The ability to regulate emotions and return to equilibrium after being knocked off course.

What it looks like: A child who can feel strong emotions without being completely overwhelmed by them. Who can calm down after being upset. Who has access to their thinking brain even when their emotional brain is activated.

What undermines it: Chronic stress, lack of co-regulation, environments that overwhelm, insufficient rest.

How to build it:

• Model your own emotional regulation
• Co-regulate (stay calm when they’re not)
• Teach calming strategies
• Create predictable, low-stress environments
• Ensure adequate sleep, nutrition, and downtime

Resilience:

What it is: The capacity to bounce back from adversity, to face challenges without being defeated by them.

What it looks like: A child who can fail and try again. Who can be disappointed without being devastated. Who sees setbacks as temporary rather than permanent.

What undermines it: Overprotection, excessive rescuing, catastrophizing, lack of opportunity to struggle.

How to build it:

• Allow age-appropriate struggle
• Reframe failure as learning
• Share stories of your own setbacks and recoveries
• Avoid rescuing too quickly
• Celebrate effort over outcome

Insight:

What it is: The ability to understand one’s own mind—thoughts, feelings, motivations, patterns.

What it looks like: A child who can notice their emotions, reflect on their behavior, understand their triggers, and make connections between internal states and external actions.

What undermines it: Lack of emotional vocabulary, dismissing feelings, no time for reflection.

How to build it:

• Help name emotions
• Ask curious questions about internal experience
• Create space for reflection
• Model self-awareness
• Normalize all emotions while guiding behavior

Empathy:

What it is: The capacity to understand others’ perspectives, to feel with them, to respond to their emotional states.

What it looks like: A child who notices when others are upset, who can imagine others’ experiences, who treats people with consideration.

What undermines it: Excessive self-focus, lack of modeling, insufficient social experience.

How to build it:

• Point out others’ emotional states
• Ask perspective-taking questions
• Model empathy in your own responses
• Create opportunities for caring for others
• Read stories and discuss characters’ feelings

The power of BRIE:
It gives you four clear areas to focus on, with specific strategies for each. Instead of vaguely wanting to raise a “good kid,” you have concrete developmental targets. ✨

The “Push and Cushion” Concept Is Practically Useful

The book introduces a nuanced approach to challenge:

The problem with overprotection:
If you cushion every fall, children never develop resilience. They don’t learn they can handle difficulty. They remain fragile.

The problem with pushing too hard:
If you push without support, children become overwhelmed. They associate challenge with failure. They avoid trying.

The “Push and Cushion” balance:

Push: Encourage children to stretch beyond their comfort zone. Allow struggle. Set expectations that require effort.

Cushion: Provide support, safety, and comfort. Be available when they fall. Don’t let them drown.

The image:
Imagine teaching a child to ride a bike. You push them to try, even though they might fall. And you run alongside, ready to catch them. Both elements are essential.

Practical examples:

Too much cushion: “You don’t have to do that if it’s scary.”
Too much push: “Stop being a baby and just do it.”
Push and cushion: “I know this feels scary. I think you can do it. I’ll be right here.”

Too much cushion: Doing their homework for them.
Too much push: “Figure it out yourself; I’m not helping.”
Push and cushion: “This is hard. Let’s look at it together. What part can you try first?”

Too much cushion: Never letting them experience disappointment.
Too much push: “Toughen up; life is hard.”
Push and cushion: “That was really disappointing. I’m sorry. What might help you feel better?”

The calibration:
Different children need different ratios. Some need more push; some need more cushion. Your job is to read your specific child and adjust.

This framework prevents both helicopter parenting and neglectful pushing. 💪

The “Green Zone” Concept Helps Parents Calibrate

Building on their previous work, Siegel and Bryson introduce the “zone” model:

The Red Zone:
Chaos. Explosion. Dysregulation. Out of control.

The Blue Zone:
Rigidity. Shutdown. Withdrawal. Collapse.

The Green Zone:
Balance. Flexibility. Openness. Optimal functioning.

The parenting insight:
Your job isn’t to keep your child in the green zone at all times (impossible). It’s to expand their green zone over time and help them return to it when they leave.

Why children leave the green zone:

• Stress, hunger, fatigue
• Overwhelming demands
• Fear or threat
• Lack of connection
• Developmental limitations

How to help them return:

From red zone (explosive):

• Stay calm yourself (your regulation is contagious)
• Don’t match their intensity
• Offer connection without demanding conversation
• Wait for the storm to pass before addressing behavior

From blue zone (shutdown):

• Gentle connection
• Warmth without pressure
• Physical comfort if welcome
• Patience—blue zone takes longer to shift

The long-term goal:
Through repeated experiences of leaving and returning to the green zone, children’s capacity expands. They can handle more. They recover faster. Their green zone grows.

The parent’s role:
Be the guide who helps them navigate back. Not the police who punishes them for leaving.

This model helps parents respond appropriately to different states. 🌟

The “Mindsight” Tools Are Developmentally Powerful

The book emphasizes developing children’s self-awareness:

What is mindsight?
The ability to perceive and understand one’s own mind (insight) and others’ minds (empathy). The capacity to “see” internal mental states.

Why it matters:
Children with developed mindsight can:

• Recognize their emotional states
• Understand their triggers
• Predict their reactions
• Make different choices
• Understand others’ perspectives
• Navigate social situations
• Regulate themselves more effectively

How to develop mindsight:

Name internal states:
“I notice you’re clenching your fists. I wonder if you’re feeling frustrated?”

Make the implicit explicit:
“When your plans change suddenly, you usually feel upset at first. Does that sound right?”

Connect behavior to feelings:
“You hit your brother. I think you were feeling really jealous. Is that what was happening?”

Encourage reflection:
“What was going on inside when that happened?”

Normalize internal experience:
“Everyone feels scared sometimes. That’s just your brain trying to protect you.”

The developmental benefit:
Children who develop mindsight don’t just have better emotional intelligence. They have access to their own minds in ways that enable self-regulation, relationship navigation, and mental health.

You’re building the capacity for a lifetime of self-understanding. 🧠

The Integration Emphasis Is Neurologically Sound

The book’s core concept is integration:

What is integration?
Linking different parts into a connected, functioning whole. In the brain, this means different regions working together rather than in isolation or conflict.

Horizontal integration:
Left brain (logic, language) connecting with right brain (emotion, intuition, nonverbal).

Vertical integration:
Upstairs brain (reasoning, regulation) connecting with downstairs brain (instinct, emotion).

Why integration matters:
A well-integrated brain is:

• More flexible
• More resilient
• More adaptive
• Better regulated
• More creative
• More capable

An unintegrated brain is:

• Rigid or chaotic
• Reactive
• Easily overwhelmed
• Less capable of complex thinking
• More prone to mental health challenges

How parenting promotes integration:

Talk about emotions (links left and right brain)
Help children tell stories about experiences (integrates implicit and explicit memory)
Stay connected during discipline (integrates relationship and learning)
Address both body and mind (vertical integration)

The hopeful implication:
Integration develops through experience. Every interaction that promotes connection, reflection, and understanding builds a more integrated brain.

Your daily parenting literally shapes your child’s brain architecture. 📝

The Parental Self-Reflection Is Honest

The book doesn’t just focus on children:

The uncomfortable truth:
Your brain state affects your child’s brain state. If you’re chronically in No Brain mode, you’re pushing your child toward No Brain.

Questions for parents:

Your own balance: How well do you regulate your emotions? What triggers you? How do you recover?

Your own resilience: How do you handle setbacks? What do you model about failure? Do you catastrophize?

Your own insight: Do you understand your patterns? Your triggers? Your history? How your childhood affects your parenting?

Your own empathy: Can you see your child’s perspective? Can you imagine their internal experience? Do you respond to what’s underneath behavior?

The honest acknowledgment:
Working on your child’s Yes Brain requires working on your own. You can’t give what you don’t have. You can’t model what you haven’t developed.

The opportunity:
Parenting becomes a path to your own development. As you build Yes Brain in your child, you build it in yourself.

This isn’t guilt-inducing—it’s empowering. Growth is possible for everyone. ❤️

The Practical Strategies Are Immediately Applicable

Unlike purely theoretical books, this one provides specific tools:

For building balance:

• Teach breathing techniques (make it playful for young children)
• Create “calm down” spaces (not punishment—tools)
• Model your own regulation aloud (“I’m feeling frustrated. I’m going to take some deep breaths.”)
• Establish consistent routines that reduce unpredictability
• Prioritize sleep and physical needs

For building resilience:

• Reframe failure: “That didn’t work. What could you try next?”
• Share your own failures and recoveries
• Avoid rescuing prematurely—let them struggle productively
• Celebrate effort: “You worked so hard on that.”
• After disappointments: “What helped you feel better?”

For building insight:

• Name emotions: “You look disappointed.”
• Ask curious questions: “What’s happening inside right now?”
• Reflect together: “What do you think made you react that way?”
• Connect past and present: “Remember when you felt like this before? What helped?”
• Validate: “It makes sense you’d feel that way.”

For building empathy:

• Point out others’ states: “Look at her face. How do you think she feels?”
• Ask perspective questions: “What do you think he wanted?”
• Read stories and discuss characters’ feelings
• Create opportunities to help others
• Model empathy in your own responses

These tools integrate naturally into daily interactions. 🎓

---

The Not-So-Good Stuff 😬

The Overlap with Previous Books Is Substantial

If you’ve read their earlier work:

Familiar content:

• Upstairs/downstairs brain model (from Whole-Brain Child)
• Connect and redirect (from No-Drama Discipline)
• Integration concepts (from both)
• Mindsight principles (from Siegel’s other work)
• Regulation emphasis (throughout their writing)

The new contributions:

• Yes Brain/No Brain framing
• BRIE framework
• Green zone model
• “Push and cushion” concept

The concern:
If you’ve thoroughly read The Whole-Brain Child and No-Drama Discipline, this book may feel like reorganization rather than revelation. The core principles are the same; the packaging is different.

The value question:
Is the new framing worth the price of a new book? For some, the Yes Brain/No Brain model will click in ways previous framings didn’t. For others, it’s more of the same.

The honest assessment:
This works best as a standalone introduction to their approach, or as a synthesis after reading the others. Reading all three may feel redundant.

Know what you’re getting if you’ve read their other books. 📚

The Aspirational Tone Can Feel Unrealistic

The book paints an optimistic picture:

The implicit promise:
Follow these principles, and you’ll raise balanced, resilient, insightful, empathic children who approach life with openness and flexibility.

The reality:

• Some children have temperaments that make Yes Brain harder
• Mental health challenges aren’t always preventable
• Neurodevelopmental differences affect these capacities
• External circumstances (trauma, instability) have enormous impact
• You can do everything “right” and still have struggling children

The potential harm:
Parents who follow the approach and still have anxious, rigid, or struggling children may feel they’ve failed or that they didn’t implement it correctly.

What’s needed:
More explicit acknowledgment that these are probability-shifters, not guarantees. Good practices improve odds; they don’t ensure outcomes.

Aspirational is fine. Overselling is harmful. 😬

The Neurodivergent Gap Persists

Like their previous books, neurotypical development is assumed:

For ADHD children:

• Balance (emotional regulation) is neurologically harder
• Resilience may look different when executive function is impaired
• Standard strategies may not work the same way
• Medication may be necessary alongside these approaches

For autistic children:

• Empathy develops differently (not absent, but different)
• Insight may manifest in non-typical ways
• Flexibility is genuinely harder for neurological reasons
• The social-emotional emphasis may not fit

For anxious children:

• Anxiety isn’t just a Yes/No Brain issue—it may require clinical intervention
• Some “insight” work can increase anxiety rather than reduce it
• Push/cushion calibration is trickier

For children with trauma:

• The timeline for developing these capacities is much longer
• Safety establishment precedes everything else
• Standard strategies may backfire

The gap:
The BRIE framework is presented as universal developmental goals. But the pathways to those goals—and sometimes the goals themselves—need significant modification for neurodivergent children.

What’s needed:
Explicit acknowledgment of when professional support is needed and how these principles adapt for different brain types.

One developmental path doesn’t fit all children. 🩺

The Research Translation Remains Loose

The book is “brain-based,” but:

What’s solid:

• General brain development principles
• The importance of integration
• Connection between relationships and development
• Emotional regulation research

What’s extrapolated:

• Specific claims about what builds particular brain capacities
• The Yes/No Brain model (a useful metaphor, not a precise neuroscientific concept)
• Exact mechanisms connecting practices to outcomes

The simplification issue:
Statements like “this builds neural pathways for resilience” are technically true in a general sense but oversimplified. The brain is more complex than any parenting book can capture.

The question:
How much of this is established science vs. plausible-sounding extrapolation from general principles?

The honest answer:
The general direction is supported by research. The specific claims deserve more hedging than they receive.

For science-minded readers, some skepticism is warranted. 🔬

The “Just Do This” Simplicity Masks Real Difficulty

The strategies sound straightforward:

What the book says:
“Stay calm when your child is dysregulated.”
“Validate their feelings before redirecting.”
“Model the regulation you want to see.”

What this requires:

• Your own nervous system regulation
• Bandwidth when you’re exhausted
• Patience when you’re triggered
• Consistency across thousands of interactions
• Self-awareness about your own patterns

The gap:
For parents who are themselves dysregulated, traumatized, overwhelmed, or unsupported, the advice assumes capacities that may not be present.

What’s needed:
More acknowledgment that developing your child’s Yes Brain requires developing your own—and that this may require your own support, therapy, or resources.

Simple to understand isn’t the same as easy to implement. 💰

The Privilege Assumptions Are Present

Like most parenting books:

Time assumptions:

• Availability for attuned interactions
• Energy for emotional labor
• Margin for reflection and adjustment

Resource assumptions:

• Stability that allows consistency
• Access to the book and its concepts
• Capacity to implement strategies

Support assumptions:

• Partner alignment (or at least non-sabotage)
• Extended family or community support
• Professional help when needed

The reality:
Single parents working multiple jobs, families in crisis, parents with their own mental health challenges—the ask may be too much.

The equity issue:
Children in resource-poor environments are more likely to be in No Brain states (due to stress, instability, threat) AND their parents are less likely to have capacity for Yes Brain parenting.

More acknowledgment of structural factors would help. 😬

The Long-Term Outcomes Are Unproven

The book promises significant developmental benefits:

The claims:
These practices will build children who are more:

• Balanced
• Resilient
• Insightful
• Empathic
• Successful
• Mentally healthy

The evidence:

• General developmental research supporting connection and attunement
• Brain science about integration
• Clinical experience
• Theoretical coherence

What’s missing:

• Longitudinal studies specifically testing the Yes Brain approach
• Controlled comparisons to other parenting approaches
• Data on which children benefit most and least
• Evidence that these specific practices produce these specific outcomes

The honest assessment:
The approach is plausible, aligns with research directions, and has theoretical support. But it’s not proven in the way medication trials are proven.

Reasonable approach ≠ validated intervention. 🎭

The “Yes” Framing Can Be Misleading

The title and framing may create confusion:

Potential misreading:
“Yes Brain” = saying yes to everything
“Yes Brain parenting” = permissiveness
“No Brain” = saying no to children

The actual meaning:
“Yes Brain” = open, receptive, flexible state
“No Brain” = closed, reactive, defensive state

These have nothing to do with how often you say yes or no to your child.

The problem:
Parents who skim or misunderstand may think they should say yes more, have fewer limits, or be more permissive. That’s not the message.

What’s needed:
Clearer upfront clarification that Yes Brain is about internal states, not about parental indulgence.

Branding clarity matters for correct implementation. 🚩

The Age Specificity Could Be Stronger

The book addresses development broadly:

What’s provided:

• General principles applicable across ages
• Some age-specific examples
• Acknowledgment that application differs by development

What’s limited:

• Detailed guidance for each developmental stage
• How techniques specifically adapt as children grow
• When certain approaches become inappropriate or need modification
• Adolescent-specific applications

The result:
Parents of teenagers may find the examples feel young-child-focused. The principles apply, but the translation to adolescence requires work the book doesn’t fully do.

What would help:
Either more developmental specificity throughout or companion resources for specific ages.

The same principles need different applications at different ages. 👶🧒👦

---

Who Is This For? 🎯

Perfect if you:

• Have children who seem rigid, anxious, or easily overwhelmed
• Want to understand the “why” behind your child’s reactivity
• Are interested in brain science applied to parenting
• Haven’t read their previous books and want an introduction to their approach
• Want a framework for thinking about developmental goals
• Have neurotypical children in typical developmental ranges
• Have some capacity for self-reflection and personal growth
• Want to focus on long-term development, not just behavior management

Not ideal if you:

• Have already thoroughly read The Whole-Brain Child and No-Drama Discipline
• Have neurodivergent children needing specialized approaches
• Want evidence-based protocols with strong research validation
• Are in survival mode without bandwidth for this level of intentionality
• Need very specific age-by-age guidance
• Are looking for quick behavior fixes rather than developmental investment
• Find the optimistic tone unrealistic for your circumstances

---

Alternatives Worth Considering 🔄

The Whole-Brain Child by Daniel Siegel & Tina Payne Bryson: If you haven’t read it, start here. More foundational brain science, which The Yes Brain builds upon. 🏆

No-Drama Discipline by Daniel Siegel & Tina Payne Bryson: More focused on discipline specifically. If behavior is your primary concern, this may be more directly applicable.

The Explosive Child by Ross Greene: For children who are significantly more reactive or rigid than typical. Goes deeper on flexibility and frustration tolerance.

Raising Resilient Children by Robert Brooks & Sam Goldstein: Resilience-focused with more practical strategies. Good complement to the BRIE framework.

Self-Reg by Stuart Shanker: Different framework for understanding regulation with more attention to stress and sensory factors.

The Whole-Brain Child Workbook by Tina Payne Bryson: If you want more practical exercises to implement their concepts. 📚

---

The Final Verdict 🏅

The Yes Brain offers a compelling framework for understanding child development through the lens of brain states and integration. The Yes Brain/No Brain model clarifies what parents are actually trying to achieve: raising children who approach life with openness, flexibility, resilience, and connection rather than reactivity, rigidity, and fear.

The BRIE framework (Balance, Resilience, Insight, Empathy) provides concrete developmental goals with specific strategies for each. The “push and cushion” and “green zone” concepts give parents practical mental models for daily decision-making.

For parents feeling lost in the chaos of childhood behavior, this book offers a map: here’s where you’re trying to go, and here’s how to get there.

However, the approach has real limitations. The overlap with their previous books is substantial. The neurodivergent gaps persist. The optimistic tone may not match difficult realities. And the evidence base, while pointing in the right direction, doesn’t validate this specific approach.

The useful parts:

• Yes Brain/No Brain framework: Clarifies the goal of parenting
• BRIE fundamentals: Concrete developmental targets
• Push and cushion: Navigates the helicopter/neglect tension
• Green zone model: Helps calibrate responses to different states
• Mindsight emphasis: Builds lifelong self-understanding
• Integration focus: Sound neurological foundation
• Parental self-reflection: Honest about adult responsibility
• Practical strategies: Immediately applicable tools

The problematic parts:

• Overlap with previous books: May feel redundant for readers of their other work
• Aspirational tone: Can set up unrealistic expectations
• Neurodivergent gaps: Doesn’t address different developmental paths
• Research limitations: Plausible but not specifically validated
• Implementation difficulty: Simple to understand, hard to execute
• Privilege assumptions: Requires resources not everyone has
• Age specificity: Could be stronger for different developmental stages
• “Yes” confusion: Title may mislead about permissiveness

The best approach: Use the Yes Brain/No Brain model as a lens for understanding your child’s states and your own. Focus on one BRIE element at a time rather than trying to transform everything at once. Remember that these are developmental directions, not immediate destinations. And adapt everything for your specific child’s temperament, neurology, and circumstances.

The bottom line: The Yes Brain is most valuable as a framework for thinking about what you’re actually trying to achieve as a parent. Not compliance. Not obedience. Not perfect behavior. But a child who can face life with openness rather than contraction, flexibility rather than rigidity, connection rather than isolation.

The child who can handle disappointment without crumbling. Who can try new things without terror. Who can understand their own mind and others’. Who bounces back from setbacks rather than being defined by them.

That’s a vision worth working toward.

Will your implementation be perfect? No. Will your child become optimally balanced, resilient, insightful, and empathic? Probably not optimally, no. Will you have days—many days—when No Brain dominates your household? Absolutely.

But the direction matters. The vision matters. The daily choices that point toward Yes Brain, even when you fall short, accumulate into something.

You’re not building a perfect child. You’re building a brain that can handle being human. That can face challenges without being destroyed by them. That can connect with others and understand itself. That says yes to life—with all its difficulty, uncertainty, and possibility.

That’s the Yes Brain. And it’s worth cultivating—in them, and in yourself.

Because the parent who approaches parenting with openness, flexibility, and resilience is modeling exactly what they’re trying to build. And maybe that modeling matters more than any technique.

Yes to that. 🧠✨

---

Have you tried implementing Yes Brain principles with your family? What’s helped your child develop more flexibility and resilience? Where have you struggled? How do you cultivate your own Yes Brain state while parenting? Share your experiences below!